smartcybers786@gmail.com 
This photo illustration, taken on January 13, 2025, in Toulouse shows screens displaying the logos of xAI and Grok, and xAI founder Elon Musk. — AFP
#Experts #flag #AIgenerated #paper #twist #climate #denial
Skids of climate change are promoting an AI-infield paper that questions the role of human activity in global warming.
A critical overview of the “Anthropian CO2-Global Warming Assumption” under the title of this article, “conflicts set climate samples and the first” courageous review “study headed by artificial intelligence on the subject has been widely shared on social media.
However, experts told AFP that many references to paper compete within the scientific community and contradict the established climate science.
Researchers of Competition and Ethics also warned against the claims of neutrality in the papers that use AI as an author.
The new research-that claims that Elon Musk’s Grook has been fully written by 3 AI-has obtained online traction, in which Covid-19 Content Robert Melon has promoted more than one million ideas.
“After the defeat of human -made climate change and evidence -based drug abuse through the Big Pharma, the use of AI for government -run -driven research will be normalized, and the standards will be prepared for its use in the reviewer,” said Melon.
The scientific consensus on the rising global fuel combustion and the rapidly severe weather catastrophes is a scientific consensus.
The illusion of the object
Experts have warned that the research in the research, despite the potential benefits, are at risk of mobilizing the objection and insight into scientific research.
Mark Nef, a professor of environmental science, argued that “big language models do not have the ability to argue. They are the model of data that they have been trained and predicts future words or phrases. This is not research.”
The article states that Grook 3 “wrote the entire prescription”, with the input of the co -authors who “played an important role in guiding its development.”
Among the co-authors, Astro Physicist Wali was soon known to be a climate contradiction that is known that he receives more than $ 1 million in the past years from the fuel industry.
Physics Hermann Harde’s scientifically used papers and soon used as AI analysis references.
Microsoologist Elizabeth Back, who detects scientific corruption, remarked that this article did not state how it was written: “It contains datases that form a paper base, but there is no indication,” he noted. “We don’t know how the authors asked AI to analyze data.”
Ashwini Panda, a Post Documentary Fellow of AI Safety at the University of Maryland, said that Grook 3 had written the paper that had unverified the purpose, which was unverified.
He said, “Anyone can only claim that ‘I didn’t write it, AI did, so it is neutral’ without any proof.
The process of vague review
Neither the journal nor its publisher – who publishes only one journal – appears to be a member of the Ethics Committee of Publications.
The article recognizes the “careful amendment provided by the reviewer and editor -in -chief”, which has been identified as hardened on his website.
It has not been made clear whether it has been open, single, or double -blind review and was submitted and published in just 12 days.
He told AFP, “An AI will effectively dispel nonsense papers” is not surprising for NASA’s top climate scientist, Gwen Schmidt, but “this retard is so low,” he told AFP, “he told AFP.
The AFP reached the authors of the paper to comment further on the review process, but did not get an immediate response.
“The use of AI is just the latest trick, so it looks like it’s a new argument, rather than an old, wrong,” told AFP, a science historian at Harvard University.
