smartcybers786@gmail.com 
#Signs #EuroUS #split #Political #Economy
After a clash with Canada, Mexico, the Middle East and Greenland, Trump -led US administration expressed little respect to Europe when JD Venus publicly criticized the European Union’s political fabric at the Munich Security Conference. ۔ JD Venus’s 2025 speech, presented during the 61st Munich Security Conference on February 14, gave rise to a significant conflict in European countries. In his address, Venus strongly criticized the European Union leadership, accusing him of freedom of expression and abolishing democratic principles.
According to a phone call between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, several media outlets saw the speech as an important moment in US European relations. Some observers described it as a ideological and cultural challenge for European allies, suggesting that it had influenced Trans Atlantic cooperation for decades. The emerging reproachment between the United States and Russia has left European states in a state of confusion and frustration, especially those who cut ties with Russia on the urging US. In their strong support for Ukraine against Russian aggression, European countries, especially Germany, have found themselves in an uncertain position.
Germany, which has long relied on Russian oil and natural gas to promote its industrial manufacturing, was the most affected. This dependence made Germany a European economic powerhouse. Now, with its relations with Russia, the country faces important challenges for its energy protection and economic stability.
The changing dynamics has forced Europe to revise its dependence on both its role and Russia and the United States. With the cost of 100 billion euros and the deteriorating relations with Russia, the European states find themselves in a swamp of despair, with no clear ending. Even Ukrainian President Zillsky appears to be shouting in the desert, leaving himself and his country to stop.
Prior to the Munich Conference, President Trump spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin, which resulted in peace talks on the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which excluded Ukraine and Europe from the debates that the US president. It is considered arrogant. This forced the European Foreign Ministers to support the European Union’s mandatory involvement in the talks.
Venice’s speech was at the Munich Security Conference, an annual forum for the International Security Policy held in the German city of Munich. Former US Senator, Venus, addressed his address between the growing tensions between the United States and Europe during Trump’s second administration, as well as the Russian invasion and political crises on Ukraine in Romania and Germany.
Venice’s speech focused on that he described European democracy, especially immigration, as an internal threat to a highly controversial issue. He highlighted the growing number of foreign -born people in Germany and growing immigration from non -EU countries, which led to the decisions of European leaders. He linked these concerns with an Afghan immigrant attack in Munich with recent vehicles and called for a more responsible perspective on public concerns about migration.
Venus argued that European democratic institutions and freedom of expression were being harassed. He criticized the cancellation of the first round of the 2024 Romanian presidential election following reports of Russian influence campaigns. Venus condemned the end of the elections, compared it in the Soviet -era ways and questioned the flexibility of sensitive democracies of external influence.
Venice accused European leaders of using terms such as “false information” and “unknown information” to suppress an alternative approach. He criticized the rules of the UK’s free speech in Adam Smith Conor’s prison, especially for violating the “Safe Access Zone” near the abortion clinic. He also condemned Sweden’s sentence about a Christian worker to burn a copy of the Quran and a copy of the police crackdown on the anti -feminist comments in Germany. Venus emphasized the importance of maintaining an independent opinion, even when he challenges the positions he established and criticizes the Munich security conference for excluding some popular leaders.
On US domestic politics, Venus criticized former president, Joe Biden for allegedly cooperating with social media companies to censor censorship of dissent, especially in reference to the Coid 19 Lab Lake theory. He said the Trump administration would take a different approach and defend the free speech.
The speech also resolved defense spending and security cooperation between the United States and the European Union. Confirming the Trump administration’s commitment to European Security, Venice emphasized the need for more and more European defense partnerships. He also criticized the European tale of Russia and Ukraine as a defense of the West as a defense of democracy, pointing to alleged violations of democratic principles within Europe.
This speech revealed a diverse response. Something dumb and some asbacco. CNN reports that most of the participants of the Munich security conference used to “encounter stony” during Vice President Venice’s speech, which only presented wreckle, polite applause. He was very disappointed with his brief mention of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, as he expected more details about the Trump administration’s view of the second Trump administration’s view of peace talks.
Many American and European diplomats expressed disappointment over Venice’s speech, which left the room quietly quietly. A former member of the Democratic House has accused Venice of accusing Europe of responding to Russian electoral intervention, while mentioning that Venice itself is interfering in European elections. –
Republican Senator John Carrin expressed hope that the European residents would acknowledge that “their free ride on US quotes” has ended. Another US diplomat called it a “wake -up call,” which indicates a change in US policy after decades of forecasts. Does this mean that the United States is referring to its imperialist role? If so, it can be good news for countries like Pakistan.
German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius compared the “unacceptable” to the authoritarian governments from parts of Venus with parts of Europe. The European Union’s Foreign Affairs chief, Kaja Kalis, felt that the United States was “trying to fight.” Former Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bulldt criticized the speech worse than expected. He also accused “clear interference” in the German elections, which supported Germany’s right and Islamophic alternative.
Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas deep stream did not agree with Venice’s claim that “eliminating freedom of expression in Europe” is far more disturbing than security issues around Ukraine, Russia and China. Lee Monday declared Venice’s speech “ideological war” against Europe. Politico described it as a “devastating ball” at the summit, which brought a war of culture in the continent. Guardian facts checkers highlighted mistakes and misrepresentations in the speech.
In response to Vice President Venice’s remarks on the Safe Access Zones Act of Scotland, which was approved in September 2024, a spokesman for the Scottish government rejected his claims. The spokesperson made it clear that no letter was sent to people for banning prayers in homes, as Venus had advised. He explained that the Safe Access Zone Act focused only on “deliberate or careless behavior” around sensitive places like clinics and health facilities. Glenn McCay, a Member of the Scottish Parliament, who played an important role in drafting the law, called Venice’s statements “nonsense”. He suggested that Venus is either “seriously misinformed” or that the facts are “deliberately misinterpreted” in an attempt to raise conflicts and conflicts.
German Chancellor Olaf Schools defended their position against the right -wing, saying that Germany would not tolerate any attempt to “interfere in our democracy”. Venus had given his statements a day after he reprimanded European leaders for handling democratic principles.
Just eight days before the critical elections in Germany, school comments had a significant weight. With the second election for the German party, the upcoming elections were seen as an important moment in the country’s political landscape. The defense of the democratic values of the schools was a clear message that Germany would not compromise on commitment to democratic integrity, despite the growing influence of right politics.
The author is a professor at the Faculty of Liberal Arts at the Beacon House National University in Lahore.
