What’s going on with DeepSeek bans

#Whats #DeepSeek #bans

The Chinese AI Chat Boat Dippec affected the global industry and sent billions to US -Tech stock with the launch of its R1 program, which claims it will cost -efficient, low -advanced Nvidia semiconductor Was done.

Now, governments from Washington to Seoul are running to ban the Chinese app from government devices, citing concerns over potential leakage of sensitive information through Georitar AI services.

AFP took a look at what’s going on:

Who has banned Deep Sak?

The first was the working room, which launched an investigation into Deep Sak, saying it was preventing the Chinese app from possessing Italian users’ data. Italy’s Data Protection Authority briefly blocked Chat GPT in 2023.

Subsequently, Taiwan banned workers from the use of deposits in the public sector and the key facilities of infrastructure, saying it was a Chinese product and could endanger national security, followed by After Australia’s day.

South Korean ministries-including defense and alliances, which monitor relations with nuclear weapons armed North-and the country’s police referring to security threats, all banned the app from the military and work computers. –

US lawmakers also moved to introduce the “No Deep Soccer on the Government Devices Act”, as well as Congress member Darren Lahaud said that there is a threat to national security that “Chinese Communist Party -affiliated company” Deep Sak Has presented to the United States.

Why are they upset?

In the terms and conditions of the Deep Sak, the third party has a section section on the delivery of personal data – which is similar to that of Openi’s chat by GPT.

But when US companies generally resist government requests for data, “When the government requests access to China, companies are legally obliged to provide user data,” Swanchoniang University Data Security Professor Yum Hong-Yule said.

“The difference between respecting the user’s privacy and providing access to the government often gives a form of how countries understand how to trust companies.”

According to the DiPsic privacy policy, it also collects information about “key stroke patterns or rhythm” that detects keyboard samples how the individual communicates with each button.

Beijing has said for its share that the Chinese government will never “need business or individuals to collect or store data illegally”.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Go Jiacon said he claims that these sanctions do not reflect legitimate national security concerns, but rather “highlight the politics of economic, trade and technical issues.”

Is this justification?

After Washington expressed concerns about DiPsic, a move by South Korea to restrict the move “reflects both real concerns to follow the American line and a reflection of their knees shock reflective “”

“US security allies, South Korea,” cannot work alone in a large -scale war situation, so they are rarely expected to follow the CyberScript leaders of the US Army, “he said.

But with justice with Beijing and Deep Sak, “no big tech company is politically neutral”.

“Google saves historical search information and has said that it is not shared with government agencies when the application is made,” he said, “he said, although big tech with officials in China. Cooperation “was more wider.”

Taiwan’s AI expert and Secretary General of Taiwan AI Academy, Isabel Hao, “has a policy of aligning with the basic values ​​of socialism.”

For example, sensitive inquiries about the Tianman Square or Taiwan state – which should usually be censored in China – should be possible somewhere else.

Ho added, “But we have come to know that Dipick actually uses the same rules when providing services abroad.

Is it unexpected?

“Dippec was launched in May 2023, and nothing can be revealed overnight,” said Park Saving Chen, a professor of Chinese studies at the University of Yongon University.

Experts have referred to a high amount of research and development (R&D) in recent years.

According to Korea Chamber of Commerce data, China was second in the world’s top R&D investors, but its investment volume increased by 11 times in the past decade. –

The Park said, “I see it (R1’s release) as a calculation that was prepared before the Trump era, and we should focus on the second and third waves of Deep Sak.”

What ahead?

DPCAC says it used low advanced H800 chips-which is allowed to sell China under US export control by 2023-so that its major learning model is strengthened.

While the semiconductor power houses are promoting the sale of South Korea and Taiwan modern chips, DPCAC has created a riot.

“If DiPsic really used the H800, it means that even without modern semidicators, similar results can be achieved with ordinary semiconductors, as long as the software is good,” Sanningkonkovan Son of the University of Chinese Economics Professor Park told AFP. .

“Countries like the United States and China are investing widespread capabilities and resources in software development,” he said.