smartcybers786@gmail.com 
#Undergraduate #Political #Economy
The undergraduate education policy, which was introduced in 2023 by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan, represents a promising effort to standardize and reform undergraduate education across the country. Designed for both Associates (2-year) and Bachelor (4-5 years) degree programs, the purpose of this policy is to include qualifying and real-world application from the point of view of higher education, from the point of view of route learning. UGEP is ready to enhance the success of students through a conceptual understanding, soft skill, professional ethics, mutual ability and employment market preparation.
The basic part of the UGEP has some important goals: promoting inter -formal education by maintaining the subject’s specialization; Connecting knowledge and business applied; And promoting creativity, critical thinking and the ability to solve the problem. Undergraduate degrees are positioned as terminal qualifications, though more education is available. The framework describes a fixed structure with 30 credit times of general education 30 credit times, at least 72 credit hours in a major discipline, 12 credit hours inter -disciplinary courses and 3 credit hours each field internship and a cap stone project. The associate degree focuses on the entry of the initial workforce and is 60-72 credit times in two years.
One of the main tensions in the implementation of the UGEP is in the neutrality of the authority by the HEC. Although universities in Pakistan are autonomous institutions with their Charters, Senate (in some cases) and syndicate, which are entrusted with educational rule and intellectual surveillance – HEC often plays a prescription role, in which uniform guidelines and curriculum structures are released. This approach treats universities such as secondary schools, which reduces its work for those who implement the centrally default framework rather than raising the foundations for intellectual exploration and educational freedom.
This trend not only reduces the educational capital embedded in individual institutions, but also traditionally backward the higher goals associated with the university education. The disappearance of UGEP documents is a deep philosophical theory of education because as a pursuit of knowledge and truth that seeks to raise the individual to wisdom, self -awareness and moral integrity. The sovereignty, which is largely high in Pakistani society, is in the restoration of humanity.
Humanity education is very important because it nurtures a deep understanding of the human condition and promotes a sense of common identity and purpose. Therefore, it is highly recommended to emphasize the teaching of classical knowledge. To achieve the truth, freedom is focused, and to protect freedom, justice should be unforgivable. This line of thinking is clearly absent in the HEC’s fixed agenda. Instead, this policy is easily useful, which is primarily focused on employment and market alignment. Although these goals are correct, they should not come at the expense of a broader purpose of higher education: critical reflection, morally responsible and socially promoted citizens.
As has been indicated earlier, universities should have places where young people are given the option to ask mainly important questions. This intellectual curiosity is not only the focus of liberal education, but it is also essential in the formation of citizens of democratic engagement and moral reasoning. The law -abiding, more needed to create a society is needed than a graduate ready to work. It demands those who recognize their interconnection with others, who value abundance and thus they are equipped with the difference to engage in constructively.
In countries like Pakistan, where ethnic, ethnic and ideological tendencies, national harmony, enmity, the role of universities becomes even more important. They should not only serve as vocational training centers, but as a urban laboratories where students learn to reconcile competitive statements, fight historical complications and create a sense of common relationship. Nevertheless, such goals are rarely described in the UGEP. Under the policy, urban education is often reduced to inferior state theory, which lacks the openness and pluralism necessary to promote deep democratic values. What will happen if the education of regional languages is mandatory, which requires learning the language of other regions?
The absence of these high goals from national education policies reveals the difference between the form and the spirit of educational reforms. Although the UGEP has introduced the development of the most essential structural changes-the Credit hour system, Capestone projects and soft skills-it fails to explain the intellectual and moral vision for undergraduate travel. From an more comprehensive and humanitarian point of view, courses of philosophy, literature, comparative ethics and political ideology will be embedded, and more curriculum will be allowed for universities to prepare programs responding to their unique social and historical context.
In spite of these conceptual limits, the 21st century’s ability, such as ethics, communication and interfaith exhibitions, is align with global educational trends. It also offers the most important structural harmony for the previously scattered education system and introduces flexibility through external options with associate credentials. Capestone projects and fielding experience indicates an attempt to eliminate academia with the industry.
However, UGEP faces important challenges for implementation. One of the main issues is a misunderstanding between policy vision and institutional preparations. Many universities lack the educational principles needed for trained faculty, administrative infrastructure and qualifications. In addition, the diagnostic frames are largely traditional, which disrupts policy -based morals. Industry contacts, although mentioned, are weak or backward, which restricts the compatibility and employment of graduates. In addition, the strict structure of general education can restrict the student agency and interfaith research, especially compared to the greater modular system that is viewed globally.
When a bench mark against the system in Singapore and other developed countries, the UGEP exhibits both conceptual alignment and structural breaks. For example, Singapore’s higher education policies are firmly integrated with evidence -powered, fruitful and national expertise needs and industry forecasts. On the contrary, UGEP, while visionary, bureaucratic and slow in adaptation.
UGEP searches in principle to promote qualification -based learning. Countries such as Singapore, the United States and Germany implement it through strong diagnostic tools, industry -related learning results and faculty development centers. In Pakistan, interfaith education is limited to 12 credit times of “Allied” courses, while advanced universities offer such as NUS or MIT flexible, modular Majers, which promote deep cross -disciplinary integration. Capestone projects are often designed with the industry in developed context, they are intensely involved in patronage and startups.
Language and communication education is also significantly different. UGEP includes exhibitions and English language guidelines, still prevents advanced educational communication training, such as critical written labs or presentation clinics, which is common in global institutions. In addition, while Pakistan’s curriculum includes ICT training, the original integration of ED -Tech tools, such as adaptive learning platform or AI -powered analytics, is less used. Civil education and moral reasoning is part of the UGEP, but the liberal arts models found in countries like Canada or the Netherlands lack the familiarity of global citizenship embedded.
Perhaps the most telling change is in a graduate job. Although the UGEP is eager to prepare students for the labor market, its industry-academia is supported. Developed countries often maintain severe impressions with employers, and enable them to permanently improve curriculum, internship programs and research agendas. In addition, the absence of a faculty development mechanism in the UGEP leaves an important gap. On the contrary, countries like Singapore invest in ongoing educational training, often through dedicated centers for the teaching center.
In order to enhance Pakistan’s undergraduate education policy and enhance global compatibility, target reforms are essential. These include setting up a dynamic, constant update curriculum to develop economic and employment trends. Establish strong industry partnerships combined with internships, Capestones and course content; Dedicated Teaching Excellence Centers to develop faculty development; Connecting educational technology through the national platform that supports blending learning and data -driven studies. Increasing students’ sovereignty by maximizing the general general education of the general education; And implement the diagnostic framework of critical thinking, moral reasoning and the skill of solving the problem.
In addition, the bureaucratic compliance, the UGEP must embed a rich concept of education – one that emphasizes not only professional preparation but also moral imagination, plural investigations and urban responsibility. Only then can the universities of Pakistan re -claim their role as real education, critical reflection and nationalism.
The author is a professor at the Faculty of Liberal Arts at the Beacon House National University in Lahore.
