smartcybers786@gmail.com 
#generational #chasm #Political #Economy
On the day, the term General Z is seen everywhere. It is used to describe a group of young people – often sweeping generals. They are called self -based, responsible allergic, the obsession of privacy and unhealthy for older generations. In a casual conversation and some media statements, General Z is presented as a breed of high -level individuals, which is focused on personal identity. He is often accused of gas lighting and rapidly criticizing traditional principles of race, gender and power.
This popular photo raises important questions: Who is General Z Absolutely? Who introduced the first place to the generation label? The difference between generations – from Baby Boomers to thousands of years, from General Z. – Why is it so dramatic in recent decades?
The generation we witness today are not just about differences in fashion, music or slag. It reflects deep social and cultural changes that have occurred at an unprecedented speed, especially during the early years of General Z. General X, thousand -year -olds, and General Z are their own dates. These labels were not organized by generations themselves. They were introduced by the media, marketers and social scientists trying to make the emerging cultural trends. Over time, these conditions have been tightened in the identity markers, not only affecting how different groups of age are considered by society, but also how they come to see themselves.
As the distance between races increases – through rapid technical change and changing social values - these differences are more than ever. Instead of flattering General Z with selfishness or sensitivity, it is time to ask: What force has created this generation? What does this widespread difference mean for the future of society?
In the professional world, the difference between General X parents and their general z children is most visible today. When the General Z enters the workforce, the cultural conflict between old expectations and new attitudes has intensified. Employer – Many of them from General X – often express frustration over what they understand as a sense of General Z, “extra mail”, and they do not want to focus their attention on individual needs rather than collective goals.
For General X, especially in Pakistan, the culture of the workplace that he helped was built around sacrifice and loyalty. In many offices, expect to be late – often dinner – without any mention of overtime. Staying on call during family events; To cover sick fellowings; Weekend work without a complaint; Or was seen as part of “determination” to play an administrative role beyond one’s skills. Success meant to be available, flexible and compatible beyond the narrow limits of job description or standard operating procedures. General Z quickly pushes back against it, not out of sluggishness, but because they see how such non -imposed laborers remove mental health and personal limits.
General Z, has flourished in a different Pakistan – which has widely questioned about economic instability, heavenly life costs, uncertain job markets and corporate loyalty. For many general Z workers, the idea of an endless turning end for an employer without proper compensation or confession is exploitation. They are more likely to ask why extra work is done without extra salary. Why the “team soul” is called only to benefit the employer. And why the boundaries between work and personal life are given fading in the name of desire.
The dismissal of the General Z as selfishness or ignorance is to lose an opportunity. Each generation has its blind places and its glory. Makes the moment of the General Z unique, the measurement and the speed that they are responding – and the integrity with which they fight it.
This generation change in attitudes is often misleading as sluggish or selfish. In fact, it is born of a different understanding of work and value. While General X viewed personal sacrifice as the value of the movement above, the General Z demands rapidly transparency, respect and justice. They are more sincere about burnout. More insist on the balance of work life and less willing to accept the ambiguous promises of future rewards.
The General Z may find it contradictory in his claims. Appreciating individual rights by questioning collective principles. But dismissing them as a ‘entitled’ makes this point lack. Their push against the culture of outdated work reflects the explanation, not confusion. In a world where old promises are no longer living, their demand for fair, balance and dignity indicates evolution, not denial. Instead of mourning the ethics of the traditional work, it is time to understand the forces of this generation. And why their ideology can only be needed.
Change in General Z’s professional attitudes is the only example of creating a wide generation. This generation has grown up with access to global information. Crisis such as economic recession, wars, climate change and social justice movements have been observed. And they have been encouraged – through the platforms they settled – the question, the challenge and the revision of their principles that the previous generations often accepted.
Social media, which often criticize the focus and promote a culture of anger, has given General Ze unprecedented tools to build communities, challenge injustice and increase voices that were once backward. Concepts such as workplace, mental health rights, gender inclusion and environmental responsibility are not concerned for them. They are central expectations. Accepting their lenses global, intersections and traditional structures is just because “similar issues have always been done.”
Of course, the General Z viewpoint is not perfect. Sometimes their two bases may be known. The immediate insistence on the change can hit the slow reality of the institutions. But it is important to acknowledge that their point of view-even when the painful-new energy brings, challenges the stagnation and forces to re-evaluate the principles that may not have been for long. The dismissal of the General Z as selfishness or ignorance is to lose an opportunity. Each generation has its blind places and its glory. Makes the moment of the General Z unique, the measurement and the speed that they are responding – and the integrity with which they fight it. In both personal and professional fields, their demand for justice, balance and authenticity not only complains to generation, but also a necessary provocation: how to preserve the system. And which of the people is obligatory for colonialism?
The ‘war of races’ can make attractive headlines, but it is through dialogue, not dismissing, that we develop. It’s not just about parents to adjust their expectations to their children or employers – it’s about making space for inter -exchange. Whether through teachers’ programs, which, in both ways, open conversations in youth forums, or policy -making spaces that genuinely add young voices, need to be understood as a problem, but as an immediate and real social issue.
Only beyond the eyes rolls and stereotypes, we can begin to create mutual respect. If the General Z is ready to engage and his elders are ready to hear – not only to teach but also to learn – we may know that the future is not a battlefield, but there is a cooperation waiting for a cooperation.
Author, as executive director of the banyan, offers youth policies in Pakistan. She can reach @Purental on Instagram.
