smartcybers786@gmail.com 
#gainloss #game #Political #Economy
He said that the Federal Budget 2025 could not be described as reform. The government has apparently been able to convince the IMF that some reforms introduced last year to please the constituencies need to be returned.
The Finance Minister has acknowledged that whatever privileges the government is providing will be provided by borrowing. He was justifying a slight reduction in income tax rates for salaried workers. Facing the media for the National Assembly Speaker and Senate Chairman’s salaries for a heavy full, he said his salaries have not been amended since 2016. He said, all increases, financing will be provided through loans.
Impression
The overall burden on the common man will increase. The salaries of government employees have been increased, but the minimum wage for private sector workers remains at the level last year. Could also imagine frustration among private sector workers. Even government employees are not pleased with the increase of 10 % that they get. Meanwhile, the capital market has also been saved from justifying taxes and construction tycoons.
The real benefits are targeted in financial stability and macro stability. The fiscal deficit is to be cut from 5.9 percent to 3.9 percent of GDP, which aligns with the IMF target. This is nominal positive for economic stability, but in general, the lower middle income will continue to hurt people.
Planners have been helped to reduce interest rates and subsidies cuts. The GDP growth target has been increased to 4.2 percent (more than 2.7 percent). Struggling reforms and industry competitiveness have been promised.
The government has apparently been able to convince the IMF that it has to return some of the taxes on the construction sector in last year’s budget. The purpose of cooperation for construction and real estate through tax intervals and privileges is to restore employment and support sectors.
The government is still improving FBR tax reforms through AI audit, facial -free customs, e -invoices, POS integration, crackdown on non -filers. It is also trying to expand the tax base and increase justice. The target of revenue has been increased by 19 % to Rs 14.13 trillion compared to the previous year.
Under the 18th Amendment, PSDP allocation of Rs 4.224 trillion focuses on infrastructure, health and equality internationally. The increase in the allocated (Rs 14.3 billion) to modernize the health sector is clearly inadequate.
Consumers have more indirect tax burden. The increase in fuel revenue and electricity surcharges will increase inflation pressure for average consumers. Low subsidies, especially on energy and food, risk of increasing life cost.
Extension of tax base and indirect taxes affect inadvertently low and middle -income households. Currently only 1.3 % of citizens pay income tax. Crackdown on non -filers can burden the unemployed infrastructure workers.
Defense spending has increased by 20 %. It is feared that it will come at the expense of necessary development costs. However, it seems that India’s relentless enmity has forced planners to allocate defense.
Poor performance in the fields of agriculture and industry can disappoint the ambitions of development. Relief can help for the real estate sector, but more fuel and energy costs will be far greater than the benefits of most families. The push of development and development in the industry can create jobs.
Infrastructure and health financing can lead to long -term benefits.
Although the tax burden of the formal sector changes, the informal sector users cannot benefit from indirect taxes and direct advantage. The macroeconomic stability and the backing of the IMF may be long-term good-bye, but short-term pain-pull-haul and subsidies will affect the life of the daily.
Indirect tax increases and low subsidies can target wallets through fuel, electricity and food. Infrastructure, growth strategies and financial discipline can stabilize the economy and improve quality of life – if reforms are conducted and effectively implemented. Informal workers and non -filers may face more costs without direct benefits. Budget success depends on the implementation – especially the implementation of health and infrastructure projects.
Raising the withholding tax rate from the bank deposit profit from 15 % to 20 %, while exempting national savings schemes is designed to encourage the change in savings in NSS from commercial banks.
Restful and tax awareness, such as retired people and middle -income families, will immediately move to the NSS. The NSS already offers more profits in some product lines and enjoys independent backing. Now, with the treatment of the priority tax, it becomes even more attractive. This can remove reserves from commercial banks, which can reduce their liquidity and loan capacity.
This will distort the financial markets. Bank deposit rates can be answered through a lobbying for equivalent treatment or equivalent treatment. The same income level collectors may now face a variety of effective tax burden in terms of savings device selection.
Bank reserves are taxed in most countries on interest revenue, but methods are different. In the United States, it is considered a part of the total income. IE increased the second income and imposed a tax at minor rates. In the UK, some interest is tax -free as a “savings allowance”. In India, interest is imposed on interest as “income from other sources”. If there is some extent, the bank cuts the TD (deducted tax on the source), but the final tax is based on total income. In Bangladesh, bank interest is withholding tax (usually 10 %), but the final interest revenue is with other income for the final tax responsibility.
In Pakistan, the deducted tax on the source is considered a final tax, especially for non -filers or in inactive income. In the general tax government, deducted tax is adjusted, and income is available with other sources in the annual withdrawal. But under the current practice in Pakistan, most salaried people and small investors consider the tax deducted tax on bank profits (especially if they come under the government or do not return). Creating unequal tax burden is done by individual behavior in ways that may distort the distribution of non -serious or capital.
The action of climate
The government has introduced a carbon levy of Rs 2.5 per liter on petrol, diesel, and furnace oil, which is effective since July 1. It is above the existing petroleum development levy of 78/liter liter on additional levy petrol and 78/liter liter on diesel oil.
In terms of rupees, this means that the price of petrol will increase from 253.6/L to 256.1/L. Diesel oil rates will increase from the current 254.6/L to 257.1/L. Therefore, consumers are paying an extra rupee/L effectively at the pump. The government plans to increase this levy to Rs 5/L in the budget of 2026-27. The new carbon levy can partially or completely depend on global fuel price trends and FCA calculations.
Power distribution companies transform fuel cost changes through adjustment (FCA) to fuel cost. The increase in petrol/diesel prices increases their operational costs, especially the thermal -powered power plants. Industrial sector complaints have already begun, about 1.27/unit additional FCA has been searched with the disco, which has previously disposed of tariff relief of ~ Rs 4.69/unit.
About 1/unit’s FCA is likely to increase the bills slightly. Industrial consumers will face maximum squeeze.
Daily travel and transportation will cost more: 50L filling will cost another Rs 125. Electricity bills for households cannot see full promised relief. Industrial and commercial consumers will share the burden through high FCA. Electricity can be eliminated or overthrown in terms of FCA adjustment. During the long term, changes in renewable energy and environmental financing can benefit, but in the short term, costs will increase.
The author is a senior economic reporter in this news.
