smartcybers786@gmail.com 
Soldiers from Pakistan and India at the border can be seen in this undated image. — Reuters/File
#tank #notes #PakistanIndia #ceasefire #remains #fragile
London: A leading defense strategy expert has been thankful that a ceasefire between India and Pakistan is critical and that the neutral or third party can help restore the region’s stability in the region.
The debate was organized at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), a London -based think tank, titled ‘India -Pakistan military dispute and regional stability and security possibilities’, titled that the two countries were in war when a few days ago.
In response to the Pahalgam attack on April 22, India launched missile attacks in Pakistan on the night of May 6 and 7. As a result, Pakistani retaliation and the resulting drone and missile attacks and the two countries were shot in the Line of Control (LoC), even on May 10, US President Donald Trump announced the ceasefire for the first time.
Rahul Rai Chaudhry, a senior IIS senior colleague and head of the South and Central Asian program, noted that there has been a sea of misinformation and unknown information by the media and governments during the war, which enables the two countries to declare victory and the successful achievement of their military goals. He said: “As a result of this conflict, the two places of the two countries have had to tighten the tightening of the other. India’s revised counter -terrorism theory, based on the next terrorist attack, has led to the future of the future of the deadly nature of the future.
Rahul Rai Chaudhry said that the fact is that Pakistan’s Army Chief, Asim Munir, has been promoted as a field marshal, which shows that he has become “strong and more popular”.
He added, “The creation of private and informal ‘Track 1.5’ dialogues between Indian and Pakistani senior officials and influential experts in third -party countries provides the best chance of returning to regional stability.
Before April 22, 2025, South Asia seemed to be a backer of comfort than in South Asia Europe, Africa and East Asia, said Desmond Bowen, ISS expert Desmond Bowen. “Now it is gone. The South Asian risk register has returned to the upper part of international concerns. He said:” This conflict was not self -controlling violence. External intervention was needed, which came from the UK, France, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and the United States. Although it began with the Pahalgam, it was followed by both India and Pakistan. The two sides were willing to take this danger in how to increase the dispute.
He said that both India and Pakistan do not tolerate the continuation of war or hot conflict. He said that there are serious economic issues to deal with Pakistan, while a major dispute is not suitable for India as it seeks to lead in take -outs and enhance its technical capabilities. He said the risks from both sides have increased and it has also proved that the world is interested in the possibility of a nuclear war.
India and Pakistan have absorbed lessons from the Russian-Ukrainian conflict in terms of their ability to use drone and missiles as the use and defense of missiles, Iiss Anton Lewsx said. He said that the meeting of the National Command Authority was convened by Pakistan on the night of May 9, which was later called, it was important. “About technology, foreign tech was involved, especially Chinese vs. Western real defense technology – misuse and misuse are still not clear but it will not be important. There was no sign of controlling a joint command with China, though the use of satellite imagery has not been discussed.”
Ice Verge Solanki noted that the conflict has described India and the United States as the opposing parties. He said that President Donald Trump has reiterated his statement that the United States has meditated in a ceasefire in several speeches and has talked about mediation in a solution to the Kashmir conflict. “It has also become a domestic political issue in India, including questions whether India has accepted the third party’s mediation on Kashmir, which the government has rejected. Pakistan has called for a” consequences of ceasefire “and a widespread resolution of the Kashmir dispute.
