
Foreign Office spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan addresses a press briefing in Islamabad on May 16, 2025. — Facebook/File
#Shun #fictitious #narratives #resolve #disputes #dialogue #Pakistan #tells #India
Pakistan has called on India to stop resorting to false statements and instead of India’s top leadership, after making irresponsible allegations, the dialogue started to resolve the residual problems.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi had said a day earlier that Pakistan would not get water from the rivers, which has the rights of India, which India illegally occupied by a deadly attack in Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) a month after New Delhi forced the rivers of rivers.
“Pakistan will have to pay a heavy price for every terrorist attack … Pakistan’s army will pay for it, Pakistan’s economy will pay for it.”
In a statement, the Foreign Office said that Pakistan clearly rejects baseless, provocative and irresponsible allegations by the Indian Prime Minister during a public address in Rajasthan.
The Foreign Office noted, “Remarks, disadvantages, false statements and statements of inflammation are clearly to prevent regional tensions for narrow political benefits.”
Modi was referring to the suspension of the Indus Wates Agreement (IWT), which was discussing the World Bank through the World Bank in 1960, which was included in a number of steps announced by India against Pakistan last month since the April 22 attack, killing 26 people, mostly Hindu tourists.
New Delhi accused Pakistan of attacking without any evidence and launched missile strikes on Pakistani cities, which on May 10 triggered the worst military clashes in nearly 30 years before the ceasefire agreed to the ceasefire.
The Indus Treaty provides water from three rivers for 80 % of Pakistan’s fields that flow from India, but the Pakistani finance minister said this month that its suspension would not have a “immediate effect”.
The Foreign Office added that statements, such as Modi, not only reflect deliberate efforts to mislead the public but also violate the principles of responsible state craft.
“Resorting to threats about military action against a sovereign nation and a serious violation of the UN Charter and the principles of international law have been established. This dangerous approach to regional peace and stability.”
‘Hate -driven statement’
The Foreign Office said that Pakistan is a permanent and active partner in the global war on terror. Communic added that anything that tried to associate Pakistan with terrorist activities is in fact wrong and clearly misleading.
“This is a tactic that is often used to divert attention from India’s own internal challenges, especially its oppressive policies in Jammu and Kashmir, especially in India.”
The FO spokesman also said that India’s efforts to mask serious human rights abuses in IIOJK have been well -known by the international community to document and rapidly.
The statement further said that their fair struggle for the plight and self -determination of the Kashmiri people cannot be confirmed by aggressive rhetoric and political deviation.
“Pakistan has called on the Indian leadership to use responsibility and patience.
“Instead of resorting to fictitious stories and warmth to electoral mileage, India should show maturity by resolving residual disputes through peaceful dialogue and diplomacy.”
The Foreign Office said that Pakistan is firmly committed to peaceful coexistence, regional stability and construction engagement. However, our desire for peace should not be misunderstood as weak.
“The people of Pakistan and its armed forces are fully prepared and are able to defend the country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
“Any misunderstanding or aggression will be fulfilled with one determined and proportional reaction. Pakistan has shown its commitment in the past and will do so if needed.
“The international community should take a serious note of India’s aggressive currency and hateful statements that threaten regional peace. It is important to discourage such rhetoric and measures to maintain stability in South Asia.”
The statement concludes that the conflict does not benefit from the glorification of the conflict, and that the path to lasting peace is in dialogue, mutual respect and adherence to international law.