India had more at stake in case of a prolonged conflict: experts

#India #stake #case #prolonged #conflict #experts

LAHORE: In addition to international media houses like “Bloomberg”, several Indian economists, some US financial intelligence agencies, former officials of the country’s National Security Council, and migrants working for global threat consultations, have been more likely to have a long -standing war in Pakistan.

During the first 48 hours of military engagement, as many Indian media houses also reported, their country’s investors lose $ 83 billion in nose diving stock markets or a total Pakistani rupee of $ 23.5 trillion, which is $ 821 trillion, with a $ 821 trillion -dollar. Is (FDD)

Messrs. “Standard and Poor” or S&P, a prominent US financial intelligence company, is primarily known for its credit rating and market index, said a long conflict could make foreign investors’ efforts to expand and supply their chains to expand and supply them.

New York -based “Bloomberg News”, which has more than 2300 staff worldwide, and Messrs. Bloomberg LP (a privately held financial, software, data and media company), Bloomberg Television, Bloomberg Radio and Bloomberg Business Week have the potential to inflict a lot of concern. According to the World Bank, domestic products are now more than eight times the size of Pakistan, the space has almost doubled since the end of the century.

Media Outlet added: “The economic disparity between neighbors is ready only to be wide.

Bloomberg added: “If India and Pakistan ever had to attack the peace deal, the potential for economic benefits is widespread. They together with about 20 percent of the world’s population and have mutually understandable languages. Although they were 2,000 miles (3,200 km), it was $ 322 million.”

Subsequently, “Bloomberg News” quoted a former director of the National Security Council of India, quoting the Secretariat, Bhasim Kasturi, saying: “For this moment, we do not know what Pakistan will react, but India needs to be lost.”

Media House is also working for his media group, another Indian, Abhishek Gupta’s views: “If any increase on Pakistan’s border is out of control and it causes a wider conflict.

According to Pamit Paul Chowdhury, the head of a South Asian practice of the New York -based “Eurasia Group”, consultation with a famous US political threat, although Pakistan’s economic problems made it the least relevant at the international stage, but it still has the potential to become an export -based nation. Pramit Paul held: “This increases your risk premium. For India, they increase the image you don’t want.”