
President Donald Trump is pictured speaking to an audience at the "American Freedom Tour" event in Memphis, Tennessee, U.S., June 18, 2022. — Reuters
#Judge #warns #Trump #repercussions #admin #defies #deportation #order
WASHINGTON: An American judge has warned the Trump administration that if he faces a court decision, he may face tension, which temporarily stopped the deportation of hundreds of Venezuelan immigrants, while also allowing them to be allowed.
Washington -based US District Judge James Boseberg said the administration could choose to follow the ideology of state secrets, which protects sensitive information on national security from disclosing urban litigation, and providing details about deportation flights rather than providing details.
Boseberg indicated that she was in doubt that compliance with the order would jeopardize national security, citing a post on X by Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
The judge’s ruling temporarily withdrew in a growing controversy with Donald Trump’s administration. The Republican president on Tuesday demanded a Boseburg motion, in which a rare scolding by the United States Chief Justice John Roberts.
Boseburg, who was appointed by the Democratic President Barack Obama, is examining whether the administration violated the order under the 18th century law to stop the deportation of hundreds of alleged Venezuela groups.
Following the order, three aircraft carrying Venezuela landed in El Salvador, where migrants are being held.
Boseberg requested details when the first two planes landed and landed, he said that the information would not be made public. In response, the Trump administration accused him of promoting his authority.
The administration wrote in a court filed on Wednesday, “The pending questions are serious and serious obstacles to the fundamental aspects of the absolute and incompetent executive branch authority.”
Boseberg responded by extending the deadline of the administration.
He made it clear that he did not find this information as part of the “judicial fishing campaign”, as the Trump administration claimed, but “to determine if the government had deliberately incited its orders … and, if so, what should be the result.” The judge did not specify the potential tension.
Trump labels decide to ‘disturb’
Trump’s critics and some legal experts have expressed concern over the possible crisis of the constitutional crisis if their administration denies judicial decisions, as under the US Constitution, the executive and the judiciary are co -branches of the government.
In an interview on Fox News, Anghum Angle, in an interview on Tuesday, Trump said his administration would not violate any court orders and expressed confidence that the Supreme Court would rule in his favor regarding Venezuela.
However, Trump has attacked Boseburg. In a social media post on Tuesday, Trump demanded a Boseburg motion in a Congress process, which is not likely to be successful, but it will lead to removal, and the judge will be described as a remote “troubled and angry”.
Boseburg confirmed in 2011 from the bench in 2011 in a 96-0 vote of the US Senate.
Roberts, a 6-3 conservative majority member of the US Supreme Court, condemned Trump on his call, and said that when disagreed with the judicial decision, the appeal was not a proper way.
The administration defends exile flights
In stopping the exile for two weeks on Saturday, Boseberg said the 1798 Allen Enemy Act did not justify Trump’s claim that the presence of Venezuela’s gang train de Aragwa is equivalent to the war act.
During the court hearing on Saturday, when two planes carrying deported immigrants were in the air, Boseburg instructed lawyers of the Department of Justice to return to the United States immediately. About 40 minutes after Bosburg issued an oral verdict in court, EDT (2325 GMT) was formally filed a written order at 7:25 pm.
After filing the order, the two arrived in Honduras after filing the order and continued to the El Salvador.
The third flight of exile departed from a Texas airport after the Boseberg order became normal.
The lawyers of the Justice Department on Tuesday argued in the court papers that the Boseburg -speaking orders were not viable in the court and that the exiled people aboard the third flight were not completely deported under the 1798 alien enemy Act.
Neither justice nor state departments responded immediately