Re-engineering the Middle East | Political Economy

#Reengineering #Middle #East #Political #Economy

In the clash of civilizations, Samuel Huntington argued that the basic media of conflict in the post -Cold War world would now be ideological or basically, not economic, but cultural. He said that the world has been divided into many major citizens – such as Western, Islamic, Confucian and Hindus with its different values, religions and traditions.

Since the spread of Western influence and the spread of globalization, cultural identities will become more clear, which will create potential clashes between these civilizations, especially where different cultural groups shared regional borders or political and political and political. Contrary to social values.

Huntington suggests that the most important disputes with “fault lines” between these civilizations will occur, especially where the Western ideology contradicts non -Western cultures. He also highlighted the tensions between the West and Islam as well as the growing power of China and the potential challenges for the Islamic world and the Confucian East Asia’s global discipline.

Although Huntington recognizes the possibility of cooperation between civilizations, he argues that the dominant samples of conflict in the future will be cultural and cultural rather than ideological or economic. His theory emphasizes that understanding and management of these cultural differences will be important for world peace and stability.

Very few people who were inclined to consider the theory of Samuel Huntington’s “Clays of Civilizations” seriously to consider when its first proposal was proposed. Many critics reject it as excessive and reduced, arguing that the global conflict has been more driven by ideological and economic forces than cultural and cultural division.

However, Huntington’s theory of Huntington, especially with his controversial and Fostin agenda related to Gaza and the wider Middle East, has achieved a new compatibility, especially after the appearance of the Trump-Vaticano axis globally.

Under this axis, the West, with Israel, has a steadfast ally, has clearly made its intentions, especially in his point of view of the Palestinian issue. Along with President Donald Trump’s son -in -law and policies, which his son -in -law, Gerard Kushner, who is a clear -speaking Zionist, refers to a form of socio -cultural and population re -engineering in the Middle East. –

It is appropriate to identify the fact that Israel, a manifestation of the modern -day avatar of the Jewish profession, emerged in Eastern Europe during the end of the 19th century. Thus, this is an extension of Western imperialism. It does not represent the interests of organic Jewish morals embedded in a specific centuries -old sectatic tradition for the Middle East.

The re -engineering of geographical political landscapes includes the Trump administration’s so -called “century bargain”, a peace proposal for the Middle East, which is clearly regarded in favor of Israeli interests, and this Designed with a strategy to change the region. In a manner that promotes Palestinian aspirations for the state systematically.

If there is further delay, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia will meet with luck, like Palestine. Time is essence.

As many predicted by many people, with the inauguration of Donald Trump as the President of the United States, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu once suffered a frustrated and frustrated and frustrated. Now they were no longer the figures of Christ Fallin that he was once, Netanyahu showed a new courage, and advised that the Palestinians be transferred to Saudi Arabia, they made the kingdom of the kingdom their land. Recovery justification.

Anyone can argue that, for the sake of peace, all Israelis should be resettled in Brazil, which has more territory than Saudi Arabia. Doing so will make 80 % of the world’s collective pain and suffering. In addition, Israel will receive the heat of its benefits, closer to the United States.

From this point of view, the Middle East and the Gulf states face extraordinary geographical political challenge: to effectively counter such design-which threatens the primary threat to Palestinian identity and sovereignty. Coalition

Leaders like Saudi Arabia’s Mohammed bin Salman and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdo ۔an have the ability to address the challenge. They should stand firmly against the Trump administration’s unilateral measures. This bold confrontation shows the possibility of resistance to the Muslim world.

When a direct opposition is met, Trump withdraws, often withdraws in a symbol of rationality or meditation. This dynamic indicates a critical need for harmony and determination from the Muslim world against the rapidly changing Middle East order. If there is further delay, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia will meet with luck, like Palestine. Time is essence.