smartcybers786@gmail.com 
#Understanding #religions #role #history #Political #Economy
Religion has long played an important role in the formation of humanitarian affairs, social structures, cultural methods and historical events. It not only provides a framework for individual beliefs, but also provides a sectarian identity that can unite or divide societies. The mutual relationship between religion and history. This relationship must be understood in the study of both subjects.
Arnold Twinby’s book, a historian’s view of religion, published in 1956, is an important task that looks for this complex relationship. Two, a prominent British historian, famous for his vast work, studies history, offers a unique perspective on how religion is found with historical process, about human nature and historical development. I reflect their extensive concerns.
In a historian’s point of view of religion, Arnold Twinby detects a complex relationship between nature. The idol of the Peruchille communities. Strength; And the discomfort he suggests that the perokil communities, which are described by the narrow, self -made limits, often tell themselves, and their lifestyle believes that they are superior to others. This idol, in return, fuel the dynamics of electricity, where the struggle for the dominance of communities, the power is a crucial decisive in shaping its relations.
Twinby conflicts with the idea of an environmental (universal) community that goes beyond such boundaries, advocates unity and collective understanding. In this framework, suffering emerges as an essential response point. It challenges the idolatry of power, reminds individuals of their shared weakness and the limits of human power, and suggests that real wisdom lies in overcoming such divisions through sympathy and spiritual development. –
Criticism of Two’s sovereignty is related to the current social and political climate in Pakistan, where focus on individual and group interests is often overwhelmed by the collective welfare of the people. Some political and social factions prefer their tight agendas as selfish, sometimes at the expense of national harmony and social development. This trend can be seen in political and religious conversations, where personal or sectarian interests shadow the maximum good of the country.
In Pakistan, selfishness in the scattered nature of political and religious factions is clear. Various political parties, ethnic groups and religious sects often prefer their narrow interests, which lacks unity and cooperation. This division also extends to historical statements, where different groups can emphasize their own version of history, ignoring or backing the contributions of other groups. National dialogue, which is based on such sovereignty, often ignores the broader context of Pakistan’s history and its role in the global community.
Two has warned that excessive self -based society is unable to develop or develop. For Pakistan, this can mean lack of social development and progress, as different groups and groups fail to cooperate in achieving common goals. It also affects Pakistan’s international relations, where focusing on national interests at the expense of sympathy and cooperation with others can hinder diplomatic and economic growth.
The challenge, as the Toabi states, has to move beyond selfishness and accept a more comprehensive and compassionate style that recognizes the bilateral relations of societies. This of Pakistan, this can mean promoting a national identity that is beyond ethnic, religious and political division and adopts a more comprehensive and cooperative ideology about its history and its future. Only by doing so, the nation can be expected to overcome the scattered and polarized dynamics that are currently hindering its social formation and development.
Twinby has discovered the role of religion in the formation of historical development, and saying that religious beliefs and institutions have been important in influencing history. Religion can serve as a force that is practiced in societies.
In the realm of religion, selfishness promotes a controversial point of view where people consider their religious beliefs justified. This prejudice lacks the definition of religious experiences and the diversity of insights in various traditions. Such an insular ideology can maintain sectarianism and conflict between individual religious communities and various beliefs. Twinby highlights how such a limited approach to a deep understanding of widespread human experience and various religious traditions.
To remove these shortcomings, supports more controversial and comprehensive perspective about the study of Twinby religion. He emphasizes the importance of adopting a historical and comparative approach that examines religions in their own context and in relation to each other. This point of view includes several important elements. First of all, the Toyni emphasizes the value of comparing different religious traditions to identify common themes and different paths. In search of how different religions address similar existential questions and challenges, historians can gain deep insight into the basic nature of religious experience and its impact on human societies. This comparative approach helps to expose the common aspects of spirituality and provide a more comprehensive understanding of religious phenomena.
In addition, it is important to understand religions in their historical context. Two believes that religions should be studied not only as a static system of belief but as a dynamic entity that is ready over time. Considering how religious traditions are intended to change the social, political and economic conditions, historians can reflect the ways in which religions are affected and affected by their environment.
Two also highlights the importance of cultural and religious interactions. Historical competitions between different cultures and religions often lead to significant changes and innovations. These interactions challenge the narrow view and promote maximum understanding and integration. By examining how different traditions interact and influence each other, historians can better appreciate the fluent and integrated nature of human history.
Finally, identifying universal topics and questions that give rise to various religious traditions helps eliminate the difference between different systems. The purpose of the Toabi is to highlight the common aspects of human experience and promote a more comprehensive understanding of spirituality. Focusing on shared existential concerns and ethical questions, historians can create more united ideas about religious thought and action.
Two -to -find the role of religion in the formation of historical development, and saying that religious beliefs and institutions have been important in influencing history. Religion can serve as a solidarity force within societies, which provides a shared framework of meaning and values that help maintain social discipline and stability.
At the same time, Two -Nabi acknowledged that religion could be a catalyst for change, which challenges current social principles and challenges impressive movements for reforms. This dynamic role of religion is very important to understand the wider patterns of human history.
Finally, the point of view of the religion of Arnold Twinby’s historian offers a thinking search for the intersection between history and religion. Criticism of their sovereignty highlights a fundamental challenge in studying both fields. Its proposed point of view – emphasizing comparative analysis, historical context, cultural interaction and universal topics – provides a way to a more comprehensive and compassionate understanding of the impact of religion on historical development.
The author is a professor at the Faculty of Liberal Arts at the Beacon House National University in Lahore.
